Skip to main content

The Leadership Challenge Workshop

Last week I attended four days of training to become a Level I Trained Facilitator for the Leadership Challenge Workshop based on the work of James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner.  I had the pleasure of being instructed by Dick Heller of Full Extension Leadership, a Level III Certified Master.  I am looking forward to obtaining my Level II Certified Facilitator training later this summer.

As part of the training we took a 360 assessment, the Leadership Practice Inventory.  I am generally suspicious of 360 assessments because the person chooses to whom he or she sends the ratings request. If a person is not serious about the assessment, they will pick people who will rank them "high" and explain away any rankings that don't fit with their story of themselves.  I personally sent ratings request to people I work with in a volunteer capacity, people I work with directly at work, and my "customers" at work.  The LPI does not rank how well you do something, it ranks how "frequently" you do something (on a scale from 1 to 10 with 10 being highest).  My scores were about half that of my other raters, but I noticed they had the same pattern so my assumption of our definition of "usually" probably differs.  What was far more interesting (and worth putting myself out there) was the individual responses from my raters.  I received rather low scores from different raters for two areas in which I actually ranked myself higher - Sets a personal example of what she expects of others and Is clear about her philosophy of leadership.  What I learned between these scores is that people see what I show them.  As a frequent blogger on leadership, I kind of laughed that people thought I only occasionally was clear about my philosophy - either they don't read my blog or they don't think I am consistent in my philosophy.  I'm guessing they don't read my blog...probably because I haven't specifically invited them to.  Probably because I'm always trying to make sure that I don't ram my ideas and side business down my friends and co-workers throats.  So I am going to try to make more of an effort to share my blog and to share my ideas with those who might be interested.  As for that person who rarely sees me set a personal example of what I expect from others.  (And no, I did not try to figure out who it was - it really doesn't matter.)  I need to make sure that I show everyone I work with that I am an example.  There are lots more questions to analyze and think about and then I look forward to retaking the assessment in a year.  I want to make sure that I work to improve the things that are important to me (because a leadership writer should be very clear to all about her leadership philosophy) and I am excited at the opportunity this 360 instrument presents.

What are your experiences with LPI or other 360 assessments?  What do you think are the keys for honest feedback?  Do they really provide you with something you can't get by asking for feedback?

More about the Leadership Challenge Workshop itself later.

On a side note, I am participating in a 31-day blogging challenge through conversion2sales.com.  Wish me luck!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What an Extraverted Intuitive Needs to be Productive

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is based on the work of Swiss psychiatrist Carl G. Jung. Jung observed that people have inborn preferences for gathering information and making decisions and that these preferences guide an individual’s behavior. The mother/daughter team of Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers expanded on Jung’s theories and created an assessment to make the combined work accessible to all individuals. Today, the assessment is used by most Fortune 100 companies and over two million people worldwide, annually. The assessment identifies an individual’s inborn preferences on four dichotomous scales: where you focus your energy, how you prefer to take in information, how you make decisions, and how you deal with the outer world. Type is best used to understand other people, improve communication, and develop individual skills. The first dichotomy is Extraversion (gets energy from other people) and Introversion (gets energy from reflection).  The second is

You Will Never Be As Hard on a Single Working Mother as She is On Herself

I was recently half an hour late to a Junior League of Washington meeting and a when I asked a question about something they had discussed earlier a friend made a joke about getting there on time.  Yes, within no time at all I realized she was making a joke and didn't worry about her.  The reason it hit home and I continued to worry about being late was that I was beating myself up inside about being late.  Her teasing comment was barely heard because of the screaming judgmental voice inside every single mother that says "you can't do this" or "you're doing it wrong." To give you a little perspective, let me give you an idea of what I needed to do to get to my meeting at 7:00 PM.  I needed to leave work at 5:00 PM, walk to a metro station, wait for the right train and take it to my station about six miles away, walk to my son's daycare to pick him up, get the feedback for the day from his teacher, on this particular day we had to find the shoe my s

Rule of Thumb for Leadership Development

How committed to that leadership development program you signed up for (or were nominated for) are you? Better yet, what does committed mean to you? I will try to attend the whole class except for that phone call I need to take and checking e-mails during the program. I will put my out of office on for the time of the program and attend the whole session.   I will do all the pre-work assigned. I will make notes and incorporate something from the program afterwards. I will work for at least six months to integrate the concepts, reflect on application "experiments," and revise my process. In a world where training professionals are constantly being able to state the return on investment for leadership training, the dirty little secret is that there is often very little return because the participants are not committed to the program.  Honestly, if you are not spending 7-10 hours working with the new concepts outside of the classroom for every hour you are inside th